Dhoni: ‘Decision to fine Jadeja is hurtful’

Julian Guyer 06:18 27/07/2014
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Unhappy Dhoni: The India captain feels Ravindra Jadeja is innocent.

    India captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni has criticised the “hurtful” decision to fine Ravindra Jadeja, saying the all-rounder had been the innocent party in an incident in­volving England’s James Anderson.

    Dhoni said Jadeja had been on the receiving end of “foul language” and physical assault and, although the India skipper did not name An­derson yesterday, it was clear he was referring to the England pace­man during a news conference in Southampton ahead of today’s third Test match.

    Jadeja was fined 50 per cent of his match fee, but not banned, by the International Cricket Council after being found guilty of 'conduct contrary to the spirit of the game', for an incident with Anderson that took place when walking off as a batsman during the lunch break on the second day of the drawn first Test in Nottingham on July 10.

    “To me, it’s a very hurtful deci­sion,” said Dhoni. “If you see what exactly happened…the umpire called ‘lunch’, and we started walk­ing.

    “I don’t want to take any individ­ual’s name, but one used foul lan­guage against Jadeja. I had to step in the middle. By that time, we had reached the ropes, and I thought the thing was defused.

    “Then, when we were going through the members’ area, I was ahead of Jadeja, who was a couple of yards behind me. Again, something happened. Something was said to him and he turned across to the in­dividual.

    “After that, he was pushed and he barely gained his balance. Then, he turned to see what was happening.

    “On the basis of that, he is fined. We were told it was against the spir­it of the game. But we can’t ignore whatever has happened… The bat was under his armpit throughout, and right from the call for lunch till the time he entered the dressing room, not one word was spoken by him (Jadeja).

    “I don’t think there was even a bit of aggression in that and that’s the reason I’m very hurt by the verdict given.”

    Wicketkeeper-batsman Dhoni added: “Tomorrow if I ask one of my players to not say a word, and that we’ll report it to the match referee, he might be like: ‘Whatever hap­pens, we’ll get fined 50 per cent. I’m better off abusing the guy’.”

    England charged Jadeja with a Level 2 offence under the ICC’s code of conduct in retaliation for India bringing a more serious Level 3 charge against Anderson for allegedly “abused and pushing” Jadeja.

    However, ICC match referee David Boon, who heard Jadeja’s case downgraded the offence to Level 1. India responded to the former Australia batsman’s verdict by saying they reserved their right of appeal although, according to ICC regulations, there can be no ap­peal against a Level 1 punishment.

    “The beauty of Level 1 is you can­not appeal against it,” Dhoni said. “But the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) and the legals are working things out.

    “We are definitely not at all hap­py with the verdict.”

    An England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) spokesperson said the ECB was “not in a position to com­ment” on Dhoni’s remarks, adding that no comment was allowed once a charge had been levied.

    India lead the five-match series with England 1-0 after a 95-run win in the second Test at Lord’s on Monday – a match that ended with Jadeja running out Anderson, after which the two players were photo­graphed shaking hands.

    Anderson’s case will be dealt with by ICC code of conduct com­missioner Gordon Lewis on Friday – the day after the third Test is due to end.

    If found guilty of a Level 3 of­fence, Anderson faces a ban of be­tween two to four Tests that could rule him out of the remainder of the series However, Lewis – like Boon – can downgrade the charge facing Anderson.

    The row involving Jadeja and An­derson comes after a recent revamp of the ICC where the ‘Big Three’ nations of India, England and Aus­tralia took charge of the global gov­erning body.

    Recommended