FIA to impose new start procedure from Belgian GP

F1i 14:57 10/07/2015
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • G+
  • Mail
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • G+
  • WhatsApp
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
The FIA rule forbids any information fed to the driver re. clutch bite points.

Consistent with its plan to restrict driver aids and radio traffic to drivers, the FIA has informed F1 teams of new start procedures which shall be imposed at this year's Belgian Grand Prix at Spa.

The governing body's initiative, which aims to put race starts back in the driver's hands, stems from its will to enforce Article 20.1 of the F1 Sporting Regulations which stipulates that "a driver must drive the car alone and unaided".

Basically, the rule will forbid any information fed to the driver regarding clutch bite points in the build-up to the race. The clutch bite point will not be able to be changed from the time the car leaves the garage for the first time after the pit lane is open until after the start lockout period after the race has started.

The FIA's new technical directive – titled "Start Practice and Start Procedures" – also specified that all pit-to-car communication during any reconnaissance or formation laps will be limited to safety and sporting information, thus banning any discussions about start procedures.

– F1: Sport is not as bad as the critics suggest
– #Quiz360: WIN a gym membership at FitRepublik
– British GP: Hamilton wins thrilling Silverstone race

In the note sent to the teams, F1 race director Charlie Whiting made clear that only information related to safety issues would be permitted, such as a critical problem with the car, a puncture warning or damage, an indication of a problem with a competitor's car, an instruction to enter the pit lane in order to fix or retire the car, marshaling information (for example yellow flag, red flag, race start aborted or other similar instructions), information regarding a wet track, oil or debris in certain corners, or finally instructions to swap position with other drivers.

The FIA says it regards any other message to be a breach of Article 20.1 of the Sporting Regulations – which could result in a penalty.

Know more about Sport360 Application

Recommended

Most popular

McLaren boss Ron Dennis describes Eddie Jordan as "village idiot"

Sport360 staff 14:00 06/07/2015
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • G+
  • Mail
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • G+
  • WhatsApp
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
Ron Dennis (l) brands BBC pundit Eddie Jordan (r) a 'village idiot'.

McLaren group chief executive Ron Dennis has described Eddie Jordan as a "village idiot" following his heavy criticism of the British team. Dennis and his troubled McLaren outfit endured another painful weekend in what has been the worst season of their coveted history.

– #Quiz360: WIN a gym membership at FitRepublik

– Also: Exciting British GP proves F1 is not too bad

– British GP: Hamilton wins thrilling Silverstone race

Fernando Alonso and Jenson Button were quick enough for only the penultimate row of the grid in qualifying, and while Alonso benefited from a host of retirements in an incident-packed British Grand Prix to finish 10th and claim his first point of the season, Button's race lasted just 20 seconds.

The 2009 world champion, who has failed to finish on the podium in 16 appearances at Silverstone, was inadvertently taken out of his home grand prix by Alonso following an opening-lap pile-up through turn three.

Ahead of the race, former team boss Jordan, now working as a pundit for the BBC, said: "McLaren boss Ron Dennis sacked ex-team principal Martin Whitmarsh but Whitmarsh never did the job of running that team as badly as Dennis is doing it now.

"You can say Honda is a mess but so are McLaren. They have been a shadow of their former selves since they arrogantly stated that Lewis Hamilton would rue the day he left McLaren. Look how that has rebounded on them.

"That arrogance is still there at the top of McLaren. They are hopelessly off the pace and anyone who thinks it is just the engine is deluding themselves. The engine is a lot of it, but there are lots of other issues there." 

Responding to Jordan's remarks, Dennis said: "I consider Formula One a bit of a family. Families live in villages, villages always have a village idiot and he fits the bill perfectly. 

"I don't consider him not a friend. I just think he is disconnected with reality. He wants to be colourful, but colourful at other people's expense."

Dennis, speaking to Sky Sports, added: "We have a real challenge with our partners Honda – they are wrestling with reliability as well as performance.

"Honda has a huge resource and it is applying it. We are in deep discussion with them on a regular basis and it is not pleasant for them.

"Is it painful? Of course but you have to use pain as a motivating force. It is the right challenge because without the support of a company such as Honda I don't think it is possible to win the world championship."

Despite Honda's troubles on their return to the sport, the man running their Formula One project, Yasuhisa Arai, insisted he remained the right man for the job.

Speaking ahead of Sunday's race, he also ruled out poaching any leading figures from their rivals to help fire McLaren and Honda back to the front of the grid.

Most popular

British GP proves F1 is not as bad as the critics suggest

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • G+
  • Mail
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • G+
  • WhatsApp
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
Competitive: Silverstone.

In a week where Formula One fans had pleaded for the sport to become more competitive, yesterday’s British Grand Prix was the perfect riposte.

– British GP: Hamilton wins thrilling Silverstone race
Massa bemoans rain and Williams mistake

– Rosberg: Hamilton got tyre decision right in victory

There will be those that argue the result still proved inevitable, with Lewis Hamilton leading home a Mercedes one-two for the sixth time this season in nine races.

But it was the journey to get there that captivated: Felipe Massa getting the jump on the two Mercs at the lights, Hamilton proving too aggressive following a restart to drop to third, and then the organised chaos of pitstops that effectively wrapped up the defending world champion’s fifth win of the season.

Sure, there was an air of predictability in those final laps to some degree but as the rain ebbed and flowed and teams played roulette with their tyres with varying degrees of success, no one could properly call the outcome of the race until the chequered flag was waved for Hamilton under dark Silverstone skies.

Hamilton’s victory, though, does not hide the fact that F1 fans have made it be known they are not happy with the state of play. Nine out of 10 fans asked in the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA) survey have said they want F1 to be more competitive. But is the sport really that bad?

Millions still tune in each week and there were some 350,000 through the gates over the three-day course of the British Grand Prix weekend. But it’s worth pointing out that Silverstone is an anomaly in a championship where spectator numbers are falling.

At the previous round in Austria, there were just 55,000 who paid for tickets, well down on the 90,000 from 12 months ago. So is better competition the key? Not necessarily.

That has long been the popular gripe: in the days when Michael Schumacher swept to championship upon championship or with the supposed yawns as Sebastian Vettel proved the spearhead in Red Bull’s period of domination before the current reign by Mercedes.

This is not probably the en vogue view but, for me, F1 still remains a breathtaking spectacle of man and machine where, on the evidence of Silverstone, viewers can be on the edge of their seats from light to flag.

But what is the answer to making things better, bar perhaps placing a giant watering can in the sky to switch on the rain as and when to turn the grid completely on its head?

One thing that has thankfully been scrapped is a return to refuelling, with the sport’s lawmakers rightly pointing out that would further reduce on-track overtaking with positions more readily being lost and gained at low speed in the pit lane.

The popular changes are wider cars, wider tyres and more noise, all of which would undoubtedly add to the show, plus there’s plans afoot – with Bernie Ecclestone the key proponent – to change engine rules to allow those trailing well behind Mercedes to play catch-up.

Easing up the technical regulations would allow teams to be more creative and pave the way for some of the less financially lucrative teams to close the gap, rewarding more on innovation than the millions that they to spend.

But the key facet of F1 is the drivers. They are the ones that delight the crowd and it is the drivers’ championship rather than the constructors’ crown that gets people talking.

Mark Webber made the point that fans want to buy into the characters, which is something that is lacking a tad from the slick nature of the sport. But more than anything, the sport’s bosses need to stop griping so readily in public.

It does not help to appeal to the younger audience which F1 is so desperate to lure when Red Bull owner Dietrich Mateschitz is continually threatening to quit the sport, when team principals are at public loggerheads about the best way forward or when the likes of Kimi Raikkonen say that F1 is not risky enough anymore.

Driving a car at 200mph should be a risk and a challenge. No one wants to see tragedy in the sport but there needs to be repercussions for a driver if he thrashes a car to within an inch of its life rather than vast run-off areas and a possible slapped wrist for gaining an unfair advantage.

Sure, F1 needs to improve, the GPDA survey of nearly quarter of a million people from 194 countries makes that clear. But it is not inherently broken. Stop the griping and get on with improving the show.

Most popular