England deny reports of near-mutiny over Catt-Cipriani confrontation

Duncan Bech 06:30 08/10/2015
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
Confrontation: Cipriani and Catt.

England have denied a report that their squad was close to mutiny over a training ground bust-up involving Danny Cipriani and coach Mike Catt.

– RWC: All Blacks ready to step it up a level in final group game
– RWC: O’Connell – ‘France a mountain of a challenge’
– RWC: Highs and lows of Rugby World Cup so far

It has been confirmed by the World Cup hosts that a flashpoint – described as a “robust conversation” – erupted between the fly-half and attacking skills coach on the day before the squad was announced in August.

Cipriani was disappointed at having learned the previous evening that he was to be omitted from the final 31 after George Ford and Owen Farrell were selected as the playmakers-in-chief.

When the 26-year-old failed to perform a drill in the manner requested by Catt, a row ensued. It has been reported that Catt twice told Cipriani: “I will end your career”.

“Danny and Mike were involved in a robust conversation on the training pitch following a misunderstanding around a training drill instruction,” an RFU spokesman said. “Mike’s only intention was only to get the best of the player as he does for all of the players. Both shook hands afterwards.”

England crashed out of the World Cup with a 33-13 defeat to Australia at Twickenham on Saturday, in the process becoming the first host nation to fail to reach the quarterfinals.

The fall-out has been predictably brutal as the ruins of a moment being described as the darkest hour in Red Rose history are examined for clues as to why the unthinkable has come to pass.

England have offered a strong defence to claims that backs coach Andy Farrell had too much influence over selection and tactics, particular in the recall of his son Owen at the expense of Ford for the games against Wales and Australia.

“To say there’s a bias in selection is absolutely incorrect and completely unfair on the integrity of Andy Farrell, who I hold in the highest regard,” Lancaster said.

“To suggest he would want to promote his son over anyone else is completely untrue and unfair. The ultimate decision on selection always rests with me.”

The management’s determination to pick Sam Burgess is understood to have been divisive, although opposition over his selection in place of Luther Burrell has been based solely on his lack of union experience.

“I’ve never had that feedback from any player at all. The boys understand there are tough decisions to make when you’re an international coach and accept it’s part of the job,” Lancaster said.

England’s performance is the subject to an internal review by the Rugby Football Union once Saturday’s final Pool A match against Uruguay has been played. The future of Lancaster and his assistants are in grave doubt.

Know more about Sport360 Application

Recommended

Most popular