Carlos Ramos will return to the umpire’s chair for this weekend’s Davis Cup clash between Croatia and the United States, Press Association Sport understands.
The experienced Portuguese official has found himself at the centre of a storm after his officiating of the US Open final, which saw Serena Williams accuse him of sexism after she was docked a game for receiving three code violations.
First she was warned after her coach Patrick Mouratoglou was seen communicating with her via a hand gesture and then she was docked a point after smashing her racket.
The 36-year-old, who was chasing a record-equalling 24th grand slam title, received further punishment after verbally abusing the umpire, calling him a “thief” in a heated exchange that went on for some time.
Naomi Osaka – a self-confessed Serena fan – went on to win her maiden grand slam amid unsavoury scenes where she was jeered during the presentation ceremony and felt the need to apologise to the unhappy fans on Arthur Ashe court.
After Ramos had to be escorted off court, Williams used her post-match press conference to suggest that men avoid such punishment for similar on-court behaviour.
Ramos was supported – albeit belatedly – by the International Tennis Federation (ITF), who said he acted with “professionalism and integrity” while the United States Tennis Association and Women’s Tennis Association had earlier backed Williams’ claims that she received unfair treatment.
But the ITF have further shown their support by putting Ramos in charge of the Davis Cup semi-final, which will be played over the weekend in Zadar.
The final Grand Slam of the season delivered on every front, with lots of drama, emotion, and unexpected series of events taking place, all wrapped around some brilliant tennis.
A veteran took the men’s singles title, a first-timer took the women’s, while umpires and the sweltering conditions emerged as hot topics throughout the fortnight.
Here are some of the biggest takeaways from the 2018 US Open.
HUGE THINGS IN STORE FOR OSAKA
Japan got its first ever Grand Slam singles champion in Naomi Osaka, who backed up her maiden title run at Indian Wells in March by lifting the US Open trophy on Saturday. She is now 2-0 in matches against Serena Williams and looks like a shoo-in for the WTA Finals in Singapore as she sits nicely at No. 4 in the Race.
We’ve seen how Li Na rocketed to fame after becoming Asia’s first Grand Slam champion and as Osaka follows in the Chinese star’s footsteps, we can only imagine what the reception is going to be like for the 20-year-old when she heads to Tokyo for the Toray Pan Pacific Open this month.
She’s level-headed, confident and showed so much poise during her first Grand Slam final which is a good sign for even better things to come for her. Not to mention her killer game of course. Her compatriot Kei Nishikori will no doubt have some serious competition for endorsement deals moving forward.
MEN’S RACE FOR NO. 1 HEATS UP
Novak Djokovic’s back-to-back Grand Slam titles means he is now just 1,035 points behind leader Rafael Nadal in the Race to London and has a legitimate chance of ending the year in the top spot. As of right now, the Serb is scheduled to only play Shanghai during the Asian swing, where he can gain a full 1,000 points if he wins. Paris would be another opportunity to close the gap on Nadal, whose health is questionable after retiring from his semi-final against Juan Martin del Potro in New York with a knee injury.
At some point it looked almost certain that Nadal would keep his top ranking until the end of the year but suddenly it’s become a two-horse race with lots at stake these next two months. The finale in London could be the decider!
SINGAPORE WITHIN REACH FOR SERENA
Her season only began in March, just six months after having her baby, but somehow Williams went from being unranked, to standing at No. 11 in the Porsche Race to Singapore. She’s just 277 points off the top-eight cutoff but it’s unclear how much she’ll be playing until the end of the year, considering her schedule has been fairly light so far. She can definitely secure a spot if she wants to but the question is: Will she go for it?
DJOKOVIC MOVES UP LADDER TO GOAT-NESS
Djokovic’s triumph over Del Potro in New York gave him a 14th major title that places him equal-third – alongside Pete Sampras – on the all-time list of most Grand Slams won by a man. The two men ahead of him are Federer, who has 20, and Nadal, who owns 17.
While I personally don’t believe a few Slams should necessarily separate someone from being inside or outside the GOAT conversation, Djokovic tying Sampras and trimming Nadal’s lead over him to just three majors will definitely help his cause when the masses deliberate the never-ending topic. With his slump clearly behind him, it’s not hard seeing Djokovic leapfrog Nadal and try to chase down Federer’s mythical 20.
Congratulations @DjokerNole 14th Grand Slam title. Freight train is on the tracks. How many will he win? Can he pass Rafa? Roger? Fun times ahead!
— Mardy Fish (@MardyFish) September 9, 2018
TENNIS RULES NEED TO BE LOOKED AT, ESPECIALLY BY PLAYERS
A few things came up after chair umpire Mohamed Lahyani came down from his chair to give Nick Kyrgios a pep talk, and Serena Williams lost it when Carlos Ramos handed her a game penalty. The most glaring issues to me are: 1) Players don’t really know or understand the rules very well. 2) There needs to be a way to ensure there is more consistency and level of strictness among umpires, and if there are rules that are not commonly enforced, they should be abolished.
Williams interpreting the coaching code violation warning she received as an attack on her character made it obvious that she doesn’t understand that code is not against her but her coach, who committed the violation. She bears the responsibility of her coach’s actions, which is why she got the warning. If the sport’s top stars don’t know a detail like that then clearly they need to brush up on the rulebook.
Vika weighing in on final: Ppl r emotional, he did the right thing (re: 3rd code) but u cant deny there have been a lot worse situations & there hasnt been any action to it. There’s too much grey area in some of the rules & it bothers me. Im not tryin to justify anybody’s actions pic.twitter.com/Cs3Kv40jUG
— Reem Abulleil (@ReemAbulleil) September 10, 2018
As for the second point, it’s obvious that all coaches send signals to their players during matches. If they’re not often called out on it, that means the rule isn’t taken seriously by both the umpires and the coaches. If that is the case, then why not just make coaching legal to save everyone from the confusion, and spare us all from outbursts like the one Williams had?
While we’re at it, the WTA rulebook should ditch the restriction on the length of leggings players are allowed to wear on the court. Currently players can only play matches in leggings that are mid-calf length. But what if it’s freezing? Or what if a player is Muslim, wears a hijab and has to cover the entire length of her leg? That’s just one of many examples of archaic rules that need to be re-examined.
STEP FORWARD FOR THIEM
Dominic Thiem’s fifth-set tiebreak loss to Rafael Nadal in the quarter-finals reminded us of how explosive the Austrian can be. But more importantly, it proved to him that he can excel on other surfaces besides his beloved clay. It was Thiem’s first Slam quarter-final outside Roland Garros and it cemented his position at No. 8 in the Race to London. A welcome boost for him as the season now enters an all-hard-court period through the Finals at the O2.
AUSTRALIA MUST GET THEIR HEAT POLICY RIGHT
After all the drama that took place because of the extreme heat in New York, it might be a good idea for the Australian Open to re-examine their Extreme Heat policies to make sure it doesn’t result in more controversy. Applying the same rules for both the men and the women would be a good start. Common sense also helps since nobody wants a repeat of the Gael Monfils-Novak Djokovic match in Melbourne from earlier this year.
Novak Djokovic believes chair umpire Carlos Ramos “should not have pushed Serena Williams to the limit” during the US Open women’s final on Saturday but disagrees with WTA CEO Steve Simon, who put out a statement supporting the American’s accusations that the Portuguese official was sexist.
Williams received three code violations from Ramos during the final. The first was a coaching code violation warning because the umpire spotted her coach Patrick Mouratoglou signal her — something the French coach later admitted to doing. The second was a point penalty for racquet abuse because Williams smashed her racquet after getting broken by Osaka, and the third was a game penalty for verbal abuse, after the American called him a “liar” and a “thief”.
Williams later blasted the umpire and described his actions as “sexist” claiming she wouldn’t have received those code violations if she was a man. Simon sided with Williams’ allegations, releasing the following statement the day after the final.
“Yesterday also brought to the forefront the question of whether different standards are applied to men and women in the officiating of matches. The WTA believes that there should be no difference in the standards of tolerance provided to the emotions expressed by men vs. women and is committed to working with the sport to ensure that all players are treated the same. We do not believe that this was done last night,” said Simon.
Djokovic was asked to comment on the incident after he won his final against Juan Martin del Potro on Sunday and whether he agreed with Simon that officiating during the women’s title decider was sexist.
“Look, I love Serena, first of all. I really felt for her yesterday. Tough thing for a chair umpire to deal with, as well. We have to empathise with him. Everyone was in a very awkward situation yesterday. A lot of emotions. Serena was crying. Naomi was crying. It was really, really tough,” said Djokovic.
“But I have my personal opinion that maybe the chair umpire should not have pushed Serena to the limit, especially in a Grand Slam final. Just maybe changed — not maybe, but he did change the course of the match. Was, in my opinion, maybe unnecessary. We all go through our emotions, especially when you’re fighting for a Grand Slam trophy.”
The ITF has come out in defence of Ramos’ decisions, describing him as “one of the most experienced and respected umpires in tennis” and noted that his actions were “re-affirmed by the US Open’s decision to fine Serena Williams [$17,000] for the three offences”.
Djokovic has had his own run ins with Ramos, including an incident at Wimbledon this year where the Serb was given a warning for gently bouncing his racquet off of the ground. Djokovic called out Ramos for “double standards” when the Portuguese did not issue the same warning to his opponent Kei Nishikori, who also threw his racquet during the match. There was another incident between Djokovic and Ramos involving a time violation at the French Open last year.
Still Djokovic refused to describe Ramos’ officiating during the women’s final as sexist.
“I don’t see things as Mr. Simon does. I really don’t. I think men and women are treated in this way or the other way depending on the situation. It’s hard to generalise things, really. I don’t see it’s necessary really to debate that,” said Djokovic.
“I just feel like, as Serena said yesterday in the closing ceremonies, Osaka deserves to have her moment. As for Serena, she knows I love her. She really inspires everyone. To see her still being so dedicated and so committed to this sport, it’s inspiring really to me and to many tennis players, both men and women, around the world.”
Former world No. 1 Victoria Azarenka, who is a good friend of Williams’, posted a live Instagram video to discuss the issue and while she agrees that a male player wouldn’t have been treated the same way, she feels the real problem lies in the fact that rules are not being enforced by all umpires in a consistent manner.
“People are emotional, he did the right thing [regarding the third code that resulted in a game penalty] but you can’t deny there have been a lot worse situations and there hasn’t been any action to it. There’s too much grey area in some of the rules and it bothers me. I’m not trying to justify anybody’s actions,” said Azarenka.
“I’m just saying that the first thing that started it [the coaching code], in my opinion, wasn’t right.”