Britain’s Dan Evans was hit with a one-year suspension on Tuesday after testing positive for cocaine in April.
Evans, ranked 108th, failed the drug test at the Barcelona Open in April and went public with the result at an emotional press conference in June.
The 27-year-old’s ban has been backdated and he will be eligible to play again on April 24 next year.
“A sample was found to contain cocaine and its metabolite,” a statement from the International Tennis Federation read.
“A decision has been issued under the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme that Daniel Evans has committed an Anti-Doping Rule Violation under Article 2.1 of the Programme. It was agreed that a period of one year’s ineligibility should be imposed, commencing on 24 April 2017.
“The ITF accepted Mr. Evans’ account of how the cocaine got into his system and that he bears no significant fault or negligence for the violation.”
Evans had accepted the ITF’s anti-doping charge, saying in June: “I made a mistake and I must face up to it.”
Cocaine is only banned in competition and Evans insisted he didn’t take it during the tournament.
He said it had got into his system via permitted medication that he had stored in the same pocket of his washbag in which he had previously kept the cocaine.
Evans’ expert, Dr Pascal Kintz, argued the very small amount of the drug present in Evans’ test was consistent with inadvertent contamination.
That explanation, coupled with Evans’ prompt acceptance that he had taken the drug, resulted in a more lenient ban that might have been expected.
“Following the announcement made from the ITF today, I want to thank everyone who has supported me throughout this difficult period,” said Evans in a statement via his agent, according to Press Association. “I am determined to return to the sport I love and compete at the level I know I can in the not too distant future.”
Martina Hingis received a two-year suspension for a similar offence in 2007, when she failed a drugs test at Wimbledon.
Birmingham-born Evans had enjoyed his best run at a Grand Slam earlier this year when he defeated former US Open champion Marin Cilic en route to the last 16 at the Australian Open.
He also helped Britain win the Davis Cup in 2015 and was ranked a career-high 41 in the world earlier this year.
However, the talented but volatile British number four, who hasn’t played since a Challenger event in Surbiton in June, has struggled to fulfil his potential after several other off-court incidents.
In the past, Evans has had his funding stripped twice by the Lawn Tennis Association for attitude and behaviour problems.
His rebellious tendencies played a major role in his ranking dropping to 772 in April 2015 before his resurgence earlier this year.
* Provided by AFP
The Frenchman broke Nadal on the way to taking the first set 6-4, and the world No. 23 came within a whisker of sealing an upset when the second set went to a tiebreak.
But Nadal, 31, with the Beijing crowd backing him on the outdoor hard court, held his nerve when twice staring defeat in the face and fought back to win the tiebreak 8-6.
The pair headed into a final-set shootout and again Pouille refused to buckle, Nadal getting the critical break of serve in the 11th game before serving for the set and match 7-5.
Nadal, a 16-time Grand Slam champion, tumbled and lost a shoe at one point, and said afterwards he was fortunate to be in the second round.
“He played well, I think, very aggressive. He’s serving well,” said Nadal, who lost to Pouille the last time they met, at last year’s US Open.
“For me it was a little bit difficult at the beginning, then I started to play better.
“But still, I didn’t have the control of the match for almost all the time.
“I am very, very happy to be through.”
— Tennis TV (@TennisTV) October 3, 2017
Nadal narrowly avoided the fate of fellow Spaniard and top-ranked Garbine Muguruza, who exited in the first round on Monday when she retired from her match with a virus.
Also into the second round in the men’s draw are Nick Kyrgios, Juan Martin del Potro, the American John Isner and third seed Grigor Dimitrov of Bulgaria.
The Russian former number one, on the comeback trail since April following the ban for taking the banned substance meldonium, had to dig deep as she defeated compatriot Ekaterina Makarova in three sets.
Sharapova, a lowly 104 in the world and on a wildcard at the China Open, has yet to win a tournament since returning to tennis.
The five-time Grand Slam champion said she had endured “a few ups and downs” in seeing off Makarova 6-4, 4-6, 6-1.
But the 30-year-old is relishing her showdown with the Romanian Halep: “We know each other’s games very well, that’s no secret.
“They’ve always been very challenging, tough, competitive, emotional.”
Sharapova, a crowd favourite in Beijing, added: “But I love the challenge of playing against someone that’s number two in the world.
“She’s a great player, she’s had a great year.
“Any time you’re able to face an opponent that’s done something right and well, it’s great to see where you are and where your level is.”
The Halep meeting will be a replay of the first-round match between the pair at the US Open in August, when Sharapova made an impressive return to Grand Slam competition before exiting in the fourth round.
Sharapova boasts a 7-0 record against Halep, who made it into the next round after Magdalena Rybarikova retired ill in the second set.
Karolina Pliskova, the fourth seed from the Czech Republic, booked her spot in round three with a 6-4, 6-4 victory over Andrea Petkovic of Germany.
The inaugural Laver Cup rocked Prague last week, much to the surprise of its many sceptics.
The Team World v Team Europe event, modelled after golf’s Ryder Cup, was organised by Roger Federer and his management company Team8, in partnership with Tennis Australia, the USTA and Brazilian-Swiss investor, Jorge Paulo Lemann.
Captained by Bjorn Borg, Team Europe, that included Federer, Rafa Nadal, Alexander Zverev, Marin Cilic, Dominic Thiem and Tomas Berdych, defeated the John McEnroe-led Team World.
The new annual event (except for Olympic years) captured the imagination of tennis fans worldwide, as they got to witness Federer and Nadal as team-mates, and even doubles partners, over three special days in the Czech capital.
And while Laver Cup was deemed a huge success in its first installment, questions remain over its sustainability and future.
We sat down with Federer’s agent and Team8 business partner, Tony Godsick, to delve deeper into the thought behind the tournament, its potential, and biggest challenges.
It met them and exceeded them all in the same. We knew we were going to create something very special but we had no idea that in year one we would be able to have such a successful event. The fans in Prague were amazing. The players seem to really enjoy themselves. The competition has been very close – the score might not reflect it but with the way we’ve set up the scoring system for the Laver Cup, there’s a chance that something exciting can happen on day three.
Rod Laver did so much for the sport of tennis but a long time ago. And some of this next generation of players are able to learn through this what he really did. Can you imagine today, telling Roger Federer to take four and a half years off of playing Grand Slams just to usher in the professional game? He’d look at me like ‘are you crazy?’
So to be able to celebrate tennis, the past, the current, the future, it’s been incredible. The reception we got here in Prague is great, the electricity, the tennis, how hard the players have tried. We’re all, from an organisational standpoint, really excited.
The players are always important and we have the best players in the world here which is fantastic. Today’s modern game, the players have done a great job promoting it, working with Tennis Australia and the USTA, partners in our organisation, really helped too, because they’ve been helping to push the word and spread the gospel of the Laver Cup around the world.
Tennis fans know when the events are happening, the good events, and they find them. Over 40 per cent of the tickets were bought by people in the Czech Republic and the rest were bought by people from 43 other countries, so credit cards from 43 other countries. The tennis fan is global and they’re willing to travel for great tennis and what we were able to offer them is three days of exceptional tennis with the best players and I think we were very fortunate to have such an incredible first year.
Like everybody else, we want the millenials, we do. We want to attract the next generation of tennis fans. I think with this shortened format, two out of three sets is great, but when you play the third set as a 10-point breaker like they do on the ATP tour (in doubles), you know you’re not going to sit there for five or six hours and watch a match.
We did a lot of stuff from a digital content standpoint – capturing the players behind-the-scenes, in the locker room, in the team room, interacting, which we were able to push out on social media. So hopefully we’ll be able to attract a different demographic but we want the traditional demographic too. People talk about the past, we want the traditional tennis demographic because those are the people that are going to actually help usher in the next generation of tennis fans.
So hopefully with different aspects and different ideas we’ll be able to touch all the different demographics. We’ll only know after but we’re looking at different things to make sure we get just that.
Sure. Absolutely. If it’s done right. In this standpoint, we’re building an event. We’re not building something for one year, we’re building something for 100 years. So you have to invest a lot of money to create your brand, create the product, and make sure the people have a great time. But yeah, tennis is profitable, the Slams are profitable, the 1000s are profitable… I mean I do think the top four players that have dominated the sport, it’s been amazing, and me being the manager of one of them, it’s amazing.
But I also think the fact that four players have dominated tennis for over 10 years hasn’t been the most successful thing for all of tennis because probably there are some tournaments that hear from their sponsors saying ‘hey, do you have Federer, Nadal, Djokovic or Murray?’ and you say ‘no’, they say ‘okay then why would we want to sponsor the event?’ So I think, and you see it now, the next generation is coming. Once there’s parity in the game a little bit more, I think the sport will be healthy.
There’s always the next generation, Roger Federer always says ‘there’ll be another No. 1, there’ll be someone always holding a trophy’. Back when it was Borg and McEnroe and Connors, and then you have Edberg, Becker, then you have Sampras, Agassi, and then you have Federer, Nadal… it’s going to keep coming because tennis creates superstars. Tennis is profitable if done the right way and if you create a product that people like from a sponsorship standpoint, from a TV standpoint, and from a revenue standpoint, it can be profitable.
We’re not in this to make a profit now, we’re in this to build something, for the legacy, to give back to the sport of tennis and hopefully create something with roots that are deep as the Ryder Cup, and that doesn’t happen overnight.
100 per cent. It’s great that they’re playing and we hope they play for years but the nice thing about this event too is it brings people back. Look at Bjorn Borg and John McEnroe. Bjorn, I don’t think will ever be a celebrity coach like one of these guys that comes back but we gave him a platform here to come back and coach for a weekend.
So to have Borg and McEnroe today here and honour Rod Laver… I hope one day Roger will be captain of the team, I hope Rafa will be captain of the team, but the next generation stars are coming. Look at Sascha Zverev, this kid is going to be a mega-star. Look at Nick Kyrgios, he’s already a star. These Americans, there’s Frances Tiafoe, there’s a lot of them. And there are a lot of players that actually aren’t here today and we hope that by seeing the product that they’ll want to be here next year and the years to come. You don’t need Federer, Nadal forever, but we hope we have them forever.
Everyone always gets upset in tennis when things happen. I think we are not trying to compete with anybody. People say ‘oh you’re doing this to change Davis Cup’. No we’re not. We are completely different.
When you put it down on paper, the ITF and the Davis Cup, this country versus country, happens four times a year, you don’t know where it’s going to be, the surface changes, it’s got a lot of history, and that’s sort of the Davis Cup.
We are region versus region, we happen once a year, we take the Olympic year off, we don’t play three-out-of-five sets, we’re a completely different product.
Same thing for the ATP. The ATP is great, it’s the platform for men’s tennis, we’d like to work with them, we’ve had discussions with them for years. The ITF… everybody in tennis gets along, but everyone in tennis seems to compete. And I hope that our event can actually in the future be the event that the sport of tennis owns together. That everybody embraces. But you know, people are always quick to – before this event even happened, people say it’s going to kill the Davis Cup. No it’s not. I see it as maybe helping the Davis Cup because the players will see what a great atmosphere team competition can be.
I’ve been in tennis for 25 years and I know the politics of the game, there’s a lot of different organisations, but we’ve treated this event, in the sport of tennis, we’ve put on white gloves and we’ve made sure we went to a city that doesn’t have an ATP event. Next year, the next city, there’s not an ATP event there. So we’re trying to go to places that want to see the sport of tennis but in no way, shape or form do I think that we’re hurting the game.
Now if we can innovate, and people will take some of the elements that we did and incorporate it, that’s a sign of flattery. But I’ll be honest with you too, we took some ideas from other things like the Davis Cup and we’ve tried to enhance them and use them too.
So I believe that tennis needs to be a family so all this discussion of the politics and people being upset, I look at it as an opportunity to make the sport grow together. Because ultimately, look at the ITF, what’s their goal? To grow the sport of tennis around the world. And I think you could ask every single fan in the stadium ‘did we do that?’ and they would say yes.
Obviously at the end of the season, it’s tough. I’ve managed top players my whole career and I know that once the season’s over, the season’s over. The World Tour Finals, especially on the ATP tour, that’s the granddaddy of ATP tennis. Managing Roger Federer, knowing what he does afterwards, these guys don’t want to get together and play another event. So we decided ‘where could we go, that would make the least amount of damage, that in the long run, 25, 30 years from now, what would be better for the sport of tennis?’
And we worked with a lot of people who are in the politics and the leadership of the game and we found this time. So we hope people like it, we’re excited about it, but once things happen at the end of the season we’d also be competing with Davis Cup, we don’t want to do that. We were sensitive, we didn’t want to go near their finals. That’s their granddaddy so that’s why we picked this date, two weeks after the US Open.
Continuing to innovate, getting the tennis family to love what we’re doing, everybody in the tennis family. We want to bring this around the world because as I said before this will help spread the gospel of the sport that we all make a living in. And so I think potentially one day if we go to places like South Africa or we go somewhere in China, getting the players to go all that way, but I think if we build the product, we make it accessible and easy and treat the players well, the sponsors, the broadcasters, people, like the Ryder Cup, will look at it as a staple of their calendar and we’re really excited about the future.